[S2M-3837.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2006 at 17:01

This looks like the vote on S2M-3837.3

The description in the bulletin on 2006-01-19 is:

*S2M-3837.3 Mr Mark Ruskell: Air Route Development Fund—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3837) in the name of Tavish Scott, leave out from “endorses” to end and insert “questions the success of the Air Route Development Fund (ARDF) in bringing sustainable development benefits to Scotland; further questions whether economic advantages have flowed to the Scottish economy from the ARDF; supports the development of an international regime that reduces overall aviation emissions; notes that promoting expansion of aviation undermines existing emissions targets and that projected growth in aviation would necessitate cessation of economic activity in other sectors in order to achieve targets; notes that the net cost of aviation to the Scottish economy was £1.4 billion in 2004 and that the United Kingdom accounts for 87% of tourist visits to Scotland; supports work to improve rail journey times between Scotland and London in order to reduce the reliance on domestic short-haul flights but notes the lack of progress in this respect, and condemns the further use of public funds for the ARDF.” Supported by: Mark Ballard* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support

You can search for this motion (S2M-3837.3) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The third question is, that amendment S2M-3837.3, in the name of Mark Ruskell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3837, in the name of Tavish Scott, on the air route development fund, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con13 0076.5%
Green0 70100.0%
Independent1 0260.0%
Lab46 0092.0%
LDem17 00100.0%
SNP19 0076.0%
SSCUP1 00100.0%
SSP0 0583.3%
Total:97 7786.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive