National Lottery Bill — New Clause 1 — Reports by distributing bodies — 19 Jan 2006 at 15:00
The no voters defeated an attempt to add a new clause to the bill. The new clause, had it been passed, would have required those who distributed the proceeds from the National Lottery to make a report each year about how the money had been spent. That report would have been made available to parliament.
From the debate, it appears that the reason that this clause was introduced was to prevent the goverment from using National Lottery money for projects that should have been funded from general taxation.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 131 (+1 tell) | 0 | 67.3% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 22.2% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 269 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 76.8% |
LDem | 0 | 40 (+1 tell) | 0 | 66.1% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
Total: | 270 | 179 | 0 | 71.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |