[S2M-3990] Decision Time — 23 Feb 2006 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-3990
The description in the bulletin on 2006-02-22 is:
*S2M-3990 Mr Andy Kerr: Fair to All, Personal to Each - the Progress on Waiting—That the Parliament welcomes the significant progress made by NHS Scotland to reduce waiting times; applauds the dedication and hard work of all NHS staff who have helped meet the targets for patients; acknowledges the contribution made by the Scottish Executive through additional investment in the NHS; notes that partnerships with the independent healthcare sector have also contributed to the capacity available to treat NHS patients; supports the continuing work by the NHS to modernise and redesign services to further improve access and accelerate diagnosis and treatment, and supports the Executive’s commitment to achieve further improvements in waiting times while securing a modern sustainable health service for Scotland on the basis of Delivering for Health. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S2M-3990) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that motion S2M-3990, in the name of Andy Kerr, on "Fair to All, Personal to Each" and the progress on waiting, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 90.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 21 | 0 | 84.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 62 | 41 | 6 | 85.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||