Identity Cards Bill — 15 Mar 2006 at 17:15

COMMONS AMENDMENTS

<[i>The page and line references are to Bill 28 as first printed for the Commons.]

MOTION A

16 Clause 5, page 4, line 44, leave out "must" and insert "may, if the individual so chooses,"

22 Clause 8, page 7, line 42, leave out "must" and insert "may, if the individual so chooses,"

The Commons disagree to these amendments for the following reason-

22A Because the Commons consider it appropriate that a person applying for a designated document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 16 and 22 for the following reason-

22B Because the Lords consider it inappropriate that a person applying for a designated document be required at the same time to apply to be entered in the Register and to have an ID Card issued to him

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendments Nos. 16 and 22 but propose Amendment No. 22C in lieu

22C Page 4, line 45, after "include" insert "or be accompanied by"

rose to move, as an amendment to Motion A, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendments Nos. 16 and 22, and do disagree with Commons Amendment No. 22C in lieu".

On Question, Whether the said Motion (A1) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 218; Not-Contents, 183.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop0 415.4%
Con128 (+1 tell) 062.0%
Crossbench21 2425.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab2 148 (+2 tell)73.1%
LDem61 (+1 tell) 083.8%
Other0 18.3%
Total:213 17755.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Ackner Crossbenchaye
Lord Ampthill Crossbenchaye
Lord Bridges Crossbenchaye
Lord Cobbold Crossbench (front bench)aye
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchaye
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchaye
Lord Freyberg Crossbenchaye
Lord Greenway Crossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Howe of IdlicoteCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Lloyd of BerwickCrossbench (front bench)aye
The Countess of MarCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Monson Crossbenchaye
Lord Moran Crossbenchaye
Lord Neill of BladenCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Northbourne Crossbenchaye
Lord Palmer Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Rees-Mogg Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lady Saltoun of AbernethyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Skidelsky Crossbenchaye
Viscount Slim Crossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Stern Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Ahmed Labaye
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive