[S2M-4370.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 May 2006 at 16:59

This looks like the vote on S2M-4370.2

The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-11 is:

*S2M-4370.2 Fiona Hyslop: Drugs and Hidden Harm—As an amendment to motion (S2M-4370) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from first "acknowledges" to end and insert "notes that in 2002 the current First Minister, formerly minister with responsibility for children, said that the Executive and relevant agencies had three years to get their collective act together on child protection; recognises that child protection issues generally, including the increasing number of cases where drugs misuse is a factor, are complex and need thought-through policy solutions and concerted action for delivery, and calls on the Executive to redouble its efforts to complete implementation of the child protection recommendations contained in the 2002 report, It’s everyone’s job to make sure I am alright, which it committed to fulfil but which are still outstanding, and to ensure that it adopts a comprehensive policy approach to proposed legislation for child protection, adoption and fostering and children’s hearings which puts the child at centre stage and which addresses support for kinship care, listens to children and to professionals in the field and also addresses support services where current spend on children’s services by local authorities on average far exceeds GAE allocation to a disproportionate extent."

You can search for this motion (S2M-4370.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The next question is, that amendment S2M-4370.2, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S2M-4370, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on drugs and hidden harm, be agreed to. Are we agreed?


There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con0 01694.1%
Green0 0685.7%
Independent1 0260.0%
Lab46 0092.0%
LDem16 0094.1%
SNP0 24096.0%
SSCUP1 00100.0%
SSP0 3050.0%
Total:64 272489.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive