Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill — New Clause "2" — Report on Operation of Act — 16 May 2006 at 17:15
Those voting No rejected a new clause that would have been added into the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. The proposed clause would have read:
[T]he Secretary of State must prepare and lay before Parliament an [annual] report setting out his estimate of the extent to which orders, rules and schemes made... [under] this Act have: removed or reduced any burden,... [imposed] a burden that has affected any person... [that] was proportionate to the benefit that was expected, or removed inconsistencies and anomalies in legislation.
The requirement to make such a report would have arguably been an "administrative burden", which would have been an example where the Act could have been self-modifying.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 150 (+2 tell) | 0 | 77.6% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 269 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 76.8% |
| LDem | 0 | 51 | 0 | 81.0% |
| PC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SNP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 269 | 210 | 0 | 77.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||