Electoral Administration Bill — 7 Jun 2006 at 18:15

<[i>Amendments Nos. 21 to 26 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 27:

Page 65, line 39, leave out "ought reasonably to have known" and insert "was reckless as to whether or not he knew"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 27) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 115; Not-Contents, 126.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 72 (+1 tell)34.8%
Crossbench5 66.1%
Lab118 (+2 tell) 056.3%
LDem0 33 (+1 tell)44.7%
Total:123 11135.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Darcy de Knayth Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Moser Crossbenchno
Viscount Slim Crossbenchno
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive