Police and Justice Bill — 10 Oct 2006 at 16:04
Lords Division Number 1
Those voting in favour (the 'contents') were voting against Government plans to add punitive conditions to the existing scheme of cautions. This Government plans would introduce financial penalities and community payback punishments, e.g. removing graffiti, picking up litter.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 207; Not-Contents, 145.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 3 | 0 | 12.0% |
Con | 94 | 0 | 44.1% |
Crossbench | 42 (+1 tell) | 6 | 25.8% |
DUP | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 137 (+2 tell) | 63.8% |
LDem | 57 (+1 tell) | 0 | 73.4% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 202 | 143 | 47.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Alton of Liverpool | Crossbench | no |
Lord Bhatia | Crossbench | no |
Lord Imbert | Crossbench | no |
Lord Laming | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Low of Dalston | Crossbench | no |
Lord Molyneaux of Killead | Crossbench | no |