Police and Justice Bill — 10 Oct 2006 at 16:04

Lords Division Number 1

Those voting in favour (the 'contents') were voting against Government plans to add punitive conditions to the existing scheme of cautions. This Government plans would introduce financial penalities and community payback punishments, e.g. removing graffiti, picking up litter.

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 207; Not-Contents, 145.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 012.0%
Con94 044.1%
Crossbench42 (+1 tell) 625.8%
DUP3 0100.0%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab0 137 (+2 tell)63.8%
LDem57 (+1 tell) 073.4%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:202 14347.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno
Lord Bhatia Crossbenchno
Lord Imbert Crossbenchno
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Low of DalstonCrossbenchno
Lord Molyneaux of KilleadCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive