[S2M-5105.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Nov 2006 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5105.4
The description in the bulletin on 2006-11-09 is:
*S2M-5105.4 George Lyon: Funding Equal Pay—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5105) in the name of Carolyn Leckie, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "recognises that closing the equal pay gap will benefit all Scots, Scotland’s workplaces and Scotland’s economy; agrees that it is the responsibility of local authorities as independent bodies to implement the single status pay agreement which they themselves negotiated, and encourages employers and unions to make every effort to reach an agreement that is fair and equitable and protects the staff concerned, council taxpayers and the services that local authorities deliver." Supported by: Mr Tom McCabe*
You can search for this motion (S2M-5105.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-5105.4, in the name of George Lyon, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5105, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, on funding equal pay, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 15 | 88.2% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 88.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
Total: | 65 | 36 | 15 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |