[S2M-5109.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Nov 2006 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5109.1
The description in the bulletin on 2006-11-09 is:
*S2M-5109.1 Carolyn Leckie: Violence Against Women—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5109) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, insert at end "and, in so doing, expresses continuing concern at the despairingly low conviction rates for rape and sexual offences and the continuing humiliation that the majority of women complainants face through the courts allowing examination of victims’ sexual history and character, and believes that the efforts of the Executive to address male violence against women must be supported by effective change in the criminal justice system."
You can search for this motion (S2M-5109.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-5109.1, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5109, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on violence against women, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 1 | 94.1% |
SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 22 | 88.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
Total: | 78 | 15 | 23 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
John Farquhar Munro | Ross, Skye and Inverness West | LDem | abstention |