[S2M-4921] Decision Time — 16 Nov 2006 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S2M-4921
The description in the bulletin on 2006-10-05 is:
*S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont*
The description in the bulletin on 2006-10-09 is:
S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
The description in the bulletin on 2006-11-13 is:
S2M-4921 Malcolm Chisholm: Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc. (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
You can search for this motion (S2M-4921) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S2M-4921, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, that the Parliament agrees that the Planning etc (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 1 | 94.1% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
| SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 104 | 13 | 1 | 92.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Lord James [Missing last name for 80026] | Lothians | Con | abstention |