[S2M-5303.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Dec 2006 at 17:07
This looks like the vote on S2M-5303.1
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-13 is:
*S2M-5303.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Fisheries—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5303) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "an outcome" to end and insert "urges the Minister for Environment and Rural Development to resist all attempts to reduce nephrops and cod quotas and to press for increased haddock and monkfish quotas to secure a sustainable future for our remaining fishermen and particularly for the beleaguered processing sector and for the coastal communities dependent on fish, but ultimately believes that the only solution for Scottish fishing is to bring back control and management of the industry to Scotland."
You can search for this motion (S2M-5303.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-5303.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5303, in the name of Ross Finnie, on fisheries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SG | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 71 | 40 | 5 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||