[S2M-5246] Decision Time — 20 Dec 2006 at 17:30
This looks like the vote on S2M-5246
The description in the bulletin on 2006-11-30 is:
*S2M-5246 Mr David Davidson on behalf of the Justice 2 Committee: Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament does not agree to the general principles of the Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill.
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-04 is:
S2M-5246 Mr David Davidson on behalf of the Justice 2 Committee: Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament does not agree to the general principles of the Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill.
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-18 is:
S2M-5246 Mr David Davidson on behalf of the Justice 2 Committee: Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament does not agree to the general principles of the Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill.
You can search for this motion (S2M-5246) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that motion S2M-5246, in the name of David Davidson, that the Parliament does not agree to the general principles of the Civil Appeals (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
Lab | 45 | 2 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
SG | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 88.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 75 | 36 | 0 | 86.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Sarah Boyack | Edinburgh Central | Lab | no |
Charlie Gordon | Glasgow Cathcart | Lab | no |