[S2M-5349.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 21 Dec 2006 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5349.2
The description in the bulletin on 2006-12-21 is:
*S2M-5349.2 Carolyn Leckie: Post Offices—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5349) in the name of Mr John Swinney, after second "Government" insert "to begin paying post offices adequately for the government services they provide, to return services that it has withdrawn, such as issuing television licenses, to post offices, to begin the development of post office accounts as a banking facility for those living in deprived and rural communities and to consider providing assistance to communities in deprived urban and rural areas to open community post offices to prevent the loss of vital local services, and thus."
You can search for this motion (S2M-5349.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The eighth question is, that amendment S2M-5349.2, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5349, in the name of John Swinney, on post offices, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Total: | 78 | 41 | 0 | 93.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||