[S2M-5378.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 10 Jan 2007 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S2M-5378.2
The description in the bulletin on 2007-01-10 is:
*S2M-5378.2 Mr John Swinney: Public Service Investment—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5378) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, leave out from first "recognises" to end and insert "notes the fact that council tax has increased by 60% since 1997 at a time when the Scottish Executive has reduced the local authority share of Executive spending; welcomes the fact that the Executive has at last begun to address the funding pressures in Scottish local authorities in the most recent financial settlement; notes that Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland was devised as part of a Tory scare-mongering campaign that has been continued by Labour; notes that there are fundamental errors in the publication making this an unreliable, discredited source of information, and believes that Scotland will only reach her full potential with the normal powers of an independent parliament." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-5378.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are six questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-5378.2, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5378, in the name of Tom McCabe, on public service investment, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SG | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 3 | 75.0% |
Total: | 78 | 32 | 5 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |