Mental Health Bill [HL] — Conditions for Community Treatment Orders — 26 Feb 2007 at 18:51

The mental health bill is largely being used to amend the 1983 Mental Health Act. This is therefore an amendment to a bill to amend that Act.

Under the terms of the Bill before this amendment the conditions for a Community Treatment Order were simply that there should be a treatment available in the community that it was necessary for " it is necessary for his health or safety or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment" and that it should be reasonable for the patient to be called back into hospital if required.

The conditions proposed under this amendment were

  • Except where a patient is detained under Part 3 of this Act (a patient concerned in criminal proceedings or under sentence), the patient's ability to make decisions about the provision of medical treatment is significantly impaired because of his mental disorder
  • it is necessary for the protection of others from serious harm that he should receive treatment
  • Subject to his being liable to be recalled to hospital for medical treatment such treatment can be provided without his continuing to be detained in a hospital and it cannot be provided unless he is liable to be recalled to hospital
  • The patient has, on at least one occasion previous to the present admission under section 3, refused to accept medical treatment for a mental disorder and- (i) when appropriate medical treatment has been refused there has been a significant relapse in his mental or physical condition justifying compulsory admission to hospital; and (ii) medical treatment following compulsory admission alleviated or prevented a deterioration in his condition; and
  • Appropriate medical treatment is available for him

There is a general toughening up, including the provision that the patient should not be making rational decisions and that informal treatment has failed with significant effect in the past.

This amendment was rejected by the Lords

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 133; Not-Contents, 136.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 56 (+1 tell)27.8%
Crossbench1 2111.7%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab133 (+2 tell) 063.7%
LDem0 51 (+1 tell)66.7%
UKIP0 150.0%
Total:134 13039.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive