[S2M-5669.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Mar 2007 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-5669.2
The description in the bulletin on 2007-03-01 is:
*S2M-5669.2 Margaret Mitchell: Dealing with Illegal Money Lenders—As an amendment to motion (S2M-5669) in the name of Des McNulty, insert at end "recognises that an increase in the number of police walking our streets would encourage and give people more confidence to report the activities of illegal money lenders in local communities, and believes that tackling personal debt and financial exclusion is an issue of social responsibility." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-5669.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-5669.2, in the name of Margaret Mitchell, which seeks to amend motion S2M-5669, in the name of Des McNulty, on dealing with illegal moneylenders, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 82.4% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 90.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SG | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% |
Total: | 96 | 15 | 1 | 87.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |