Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 — Regrets the they have not been replaced — rejected — 5 Mar 2007 at 17:09
The Motion before the Lords was for to approve the continuance of the Control Order powers, as required annually by the Act.
Those voting Aye failed to add to the motion:
but this House regrets that the Government have not replaced control orders with new measures to strengthen the ability of terror suspects to be prosecuted in court.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Lab||134 (+2 tell)||5||66.5%|
|LDem||0||49 (+2 tell)||65.4%|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Currie of Marylebone||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Low of Dalston||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Clinton-Davis||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Lord Judd||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws||Lab||aye|
|Lord Plant of Highfield||Lab (minister)||aye|