[S2M-5632] Decision Time — 15 Mar 2007 at 16:15
This looks like the vote on S2M-5632
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-22 is:
*S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont*
The description in the bulletin on 2007-02-26 is:
S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
The description in the bulletin on 2007-03-12 is:
S2M-5632 Cathy Jamieson: Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Johann Lamont
You can search for this motion (S2M-5632) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are only two questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-5632, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Parliament agrees that the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 4 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Independent | 2 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SG | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 22 | 0 | 0 | 88.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Total: | 89 | 23 | 3 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||