Serious Crime Bill [HL] — 25 Apr 2007 at 18:40
moved AmendmentNo. 37:
Clause 33, page 22, line 19, at end insert-
"(3) Notwithstanding this, the rules on admissibility of evidence to be observed in such proceedings shall be the same as those observed in trials on indictment; and no person shall be required in such proceedings to answer any question or to produce any document which he could not be required to answer or produce in similar proceedings in a trial on indictment."
On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. 37) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 43; Not-Contents, 115.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 1 | 1.0% |
| Crossbench | 4 | 2 | 3.2% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 104 (+2 tell) | 0 | 49.1% |
| LDem | 0 | 36 (+2 tell) | 48.1% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 110 | 41 | 22.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Lloyd of Berwick | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Walpole | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |