Offender Management Bill — 11 Jun 2007 at 15:41

House in Committee accordingly.

[The CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES (Lord Brabazon of Tara) in the Chair.]

moved Amendment No. 99:

After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause-
"Procedure for orders under section 12
(1) The Secretary of State must not make an order under section 12 unless-

(a) a draft of the order has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House; and(b) each of the resolutions for approving the draft was agreed more than 60 days after the day on which the draft was laid before the House in question.

(2) No draft order under section 12 is to be laid before Parliament unless-

(a) the Secretary of State has prepared and published a report containing a proposal for the making of such provision; (b) the report sets out the Secretary of State's reasons for making the proposal;(c) the report has been laid before Parliament and each House has approved the proposal contained in the report, either with or without modifications; and(d) the draft order gives effect to the proposal so far as approved by both Houses.

(3) An approval given in either House satisfies the requirements of subsection (2)(c) only if it was given in that House on the first occasion on which a motion for the approval of the proposal was made in that House by a Minister of the Crown after-

(a) the laying of the report; or(b) if more than one report containing that proposal has been laid before that House, the laying of the one laid most recently.

(4) In reckoning a period of 60 days for the purposes of subsection (1), no account shall be taken of a day for which-

(a) Parliament is dissolved or prorogued; or(b) the House in question is adjourned as part of an adjournment for more than four days."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 99) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 170; Not-Contents, 125.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.8%
Con88 (+1 tell) 043.4%
Crossbench31 518.8%
Lab2 118 (+2 tell)57.5%
LDem45 (+1 tell) 059.0%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:168 12341.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Campbell of SurbitonCrossbenchno
Lord Elystan-Morgan Crossbenchno
Lord Marsh Crossbenchno
Lord Moser Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Murphy Crossbenchno
Baroness Gibson of Market RasenLab (minister)aye
Baroness Turner of CamdenLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive