Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill — custody — 25 Jun 2007 at 18:09

This motion is whether the House of Lords insists on it's amendment rather than the Commons amendment. The effect of the the Lords amendment is to include all those in custody within the terms of the Bill, whereas the Commons wishes to omit this provision. Those voting not-content wish to side with the Comons in leaving custody issues out of the Bill. Thoe voting Content wish to include custody in the Bill.

On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. A1) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 183; Not-Contents, 145.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.8%
Con96 (+1 tell) 046.4%
Crossbench21 (+1 tell) 313.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab1 139 (+2 tell)66.0%
LDem58 073.4%
Total:178 14244.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Baroness Meacher Crossbenchno
Lord Wedderburn of CharltonCrossbenchno
Lord Morris of HandsworthLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive