Offender Management Bill — 27 Jun 2007 at 17:08

Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.

Clause 2 <[i>Responsibility for ensuring the provision of probation services]:

moved Amendment No. 3:

Clause 2, page 3, line 7, leave out paragraph (c) and insert-

"(c) the proper enforcement of court orders;"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3) shall be agreed to?

*Their Lordships divided: Contents, 77; Not-Contents, 140.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 13.8%
Con3 11.9%
Crossbench9 23 (+1 tell)17.2%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab124 (+2 tell) 159.1%
LDem0 50 (+1 tell)64.6%
Total:137 7730.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Swinfen Conaye
Lord Adebowale Crossbenchno
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Lord Elystan-Morgan Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Krebs Crossbenchno
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchno
Lord Sutherland of HoundwoodCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Judd Lab (minister)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive