Pensions Bill — 24 Jul 2007 at 16:54
Insert the following new Clause-
"Post-legislative scrutiny
Four years after the passing of this Act the Secretary of State shall arrange for post-legislative scrutiny of this Act to check on its operation and may arrange subsequent scrutiny."
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 28 for the following Reason-
Because the Commons consider that imposing an obligation on the Secretary of State to arrange for post-legislative scrutiny is unnecessary.
Insert the following new Clause-
"Review of operation of Act
(1) The Secretary of State must, before the end of 2017, prepare a report on the operation of the provisions of this Act.
(2) The Secretary of State may prepare subsequent reports on the operation of the provisions of this Act.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of any report prepared under this section before Parliament."
Page 26, line 38, at end insert-
"( ) But section (Review of operation of Act) extends to Northern Ireland in accordance with subsection (1) only as respects the provisions of this Act extending there."
On Question, Whether the said Motion (No. E1) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 186; Not-Contents, 143.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 2 | 0 | 7.7% |
| Con | 100 (+2 tell) | 0 | 49.0% |
| Crossbench | 23 | 6 | 15.3% |
| DUP | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 133 (+2 tell) | 60.8% |
| LDem | 52 | 0 | 65.8% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 182 | 139 | 44.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Baroness Boothroyd | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Boston of Faversham | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Hannay of Chiswick | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Kilclooney | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Lewis of Newnham | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | Crossbench | no |