[S3M-607.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 Oct 2007 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S3M-607.2
The description in the bulletin on 2007-10-04 is:
*S3M-607.2 Jeremy Purvis: The Scottish National Party’s Broken Promises—As an amendment to motion (S3M-607) in the name of Iain Gray, leave out from "recognises" to end and insert "further notes the SNP Government’s reluctance to keep its promise to students and dump student debt by writing off the debt to the Student Loans Company for Scottish domiciled graduates; notes the SNP Government’s refusal to meet its manifesto pledge for mandatory carbon reduction targets of 3% per annum; recognises that the SNP gained votes on these pre-election promises to the people of Scotland which they are now failing to keep, and calls on Scottish ministers to make a statement to the Parliament explaining which of these pre-election promises are no longer government policy and why, and which promises they do intend to implement and by when."
You can search for this motion (S3M-607.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-607.2, in the name of Jeremy Purvis, which seeks to amend motion S3M-607, in the name of Iain Gray, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
Green | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 43 | 0 | 0 | 93.5% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 46 | 0 | 97.9% |
Total: | 70 | 48 | 0 | 92.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |