[S3M-677.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 Oct 2007 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S3M-677.1
The description in the bulletin on 2007-10-25 is:
*S3M-677.1 Kenny MacAskill: Police Numbers—As an amendment to motion (S3M-677) in the name of Bill Aitken, leave out from "with serious concern" to end and insert "that the Scottish Government will set out its plans for a more visible police presence in the context of the Strategic Spending Review 2007 and will deliver an additional 1,000 police officers in our communities through increased recruitment, improved retention and redeployment." Supported by: Fergus Ewing* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S3M-677.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 46 | 0 | 97.9% |
Total: | 77 | 46 | 2 | 98.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |