[S3M-1017.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Dec 2007 at 17:40
This looks like the vote on S3M-1017.2
The description in the bulletin on 2007-12-13 is:
*S3M-1017.2 Patrick Harvie: Civil Liberties—As an amendment to motion (S3M-1017) in the name of Margaret Smith, leave out from "are secure" to "accountable to the Parliament" and insert "comply with the principles of data protection, namely that personal information must be fairly and lawfully processed, processed for limited purposes, adequate, relevant and not excessive, accurate and up to date, not kept for longer than necessary, processed in line with individuals’ rights, secure and not transmitted to other countries without adequate protection, and that audit of data under its jurisdiction is independent of government and accountable to the Parliament; further calls on the Scottish Government to review plans for Scottish Citizens Accounts on the basis of these principles". Supported by: Robin Harper*
You can search for this motion (S3M-1017.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-1017.2, in the name of Patrick Harvie, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1017, in the name of Margaret Smith, on civil liberties, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 0 | 42 | 91.3% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 64 | 16 | 42 | 95.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |