[S3M-1017.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Dec 2007 at 17:40
This looks like the vote on S3M-1017.1
The description in the bulletin on 2007-12-13 is:
*S3M-1017.1 Bill Aitken: Civil Liberties—As an amendment to motion (S3M-1017) in the name of Margaret Smith, insert at end "and believes that the money proposed to be spent on ID cards should be used for more worthwhile projects, such as a dedicated UK border police force, more prison places or on increasing the number of drug rehabilitation places."
You can search for this motion (S3M-1017.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-1017.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1017, in the name of Margaret Smith, on civil liberties, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97.8% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95.7% |
| Total: | 18 | 16 | 91 | 97.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||