[S3M-1489.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 6 Mar 2008 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-1489.2
The description in the bulletin on 2008-03-06 is:
*S3M-1489.2 Sarah Boyack: OECD Review of Scotland’s Rural Policy—As an amendment to motion (S3M-1489) in the name of Richard Lochhead, insert at end "however is concerned that recent Scottish Government budget decisions have the capacity to set back progress made." Supported by: Karen Gillon*
You can search for this motion (S3M-1489.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-1489.2, in the name of Sarah Boyack, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1489, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development review of Scotland's rural policy, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 43 | 0 | 93.5% |
LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 65 | 58 | 1 | 96.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |