[S3M-2635] Decision Time — 2 Oct 2008 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S3M-2635
The description in the bulletin on 2008-10-01 is:
*S3M-2635 Richard Lochhead: Scudamore Report into Foot and Mouth Disease—That the Parliament supports the Scudamore report’s conclusions on Scotland’s handling of the 2007 foot and mouth disease outbreak, contained in Foot and Mouth Disease Review (Scotland) 2007, and welcomes the Scottish Government’s commitment to take the recommendations forward, including consideration of any potential opportunities for regionalisation and other steps to minimise the potential future disruption to the Scottish livestock industry. Supported by: Michael Russell*
You can search for this motion (S3M-2635) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The ninth question is, that motion S3M-2635, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the Scudamore report into foot-and-mouth disease, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 38 | 0 | 82.6% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 64 | 38 | 16 | 92.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |