[S3M-3214] Decision Time — 15 Jan 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3214
The description in the bulletin on 2009-01-14 is:
*S3M-3214 John Swinney: Forth Crossing—That the Parliament notes the Scottish Government’s choice of conventional capital funding for construction of the Forth Replacement Crossing and welcomes the fact that Scotland’s biggest infrastructure project for a generation will be delivered without the need for tolls. Supported by: Stewart Stevenson*
You can search for this motion (S3M-3214) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The final question is, that motion S3M-3214, in the name of John Swinney, on the Forth crossing, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 41 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 121 | 2 | 0 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||