[S3M-3849.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 2 Apr 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3849.1
The description in the bulletin on 2009-04-02 is:
*S3M-3849.1 Bill Aitken: Antisocial Behaviour Framework—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3849) in the name of Fergus Ewing, leave out from "it builds" to end and insert "the success of the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 has not been universal; agrees that antisocial behaviour blights the quality of people’s lives and should not be tolerated but believes that prevention is better than cure when it comes to protecting communities from disorder and encourages communities to report all incidents of crime and disorder so that they can be properly addressed, and appreciates the wealth of good practice followed in some areas of Scotland and the importance of replicating it as widely as possible."
You can search for this motion (S3M-3849.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-3849.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3849, in the name of Fergus Ewing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 44 | 0 | 95.7% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 79 | 44 | 0 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |