[S3M-3849.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 2 Apr 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3849.3
The description in the bulletin on 2009-04-02 is:
*S3M-3849.3 Robert Brown: Antisocial Behaviour Framework—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3849) in the name of Fergus Ewing, insert at end "; welcomes the framework’s emphasis on addressing the causes of antisocial behaviour, such as drug and alcohol addiction and deprivation, and on improving life chances; supports the promotion of the new prevention, early intervention, enforcement and rehabilitation (PIER) model, including the use of acceptable behaviour contracts pioneered by Liberal Democrats in Islington, and regards increased community involvement and empowerment as vital components of success in action to tackle antisocial behaviour."
You can search for this motion (S3M-3849.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-3849.3, in the name of Robert Brown, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3849, in the name of Fergus Ewing, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 1 | 43 | 0 | 95.7% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 63 | 58 | 2 | 96.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Mary Mulligan | Linlithgow | Lab | aye |