[S3M-4004] Decision Time — 30 Apr 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-4004
The description in the bulletin on 2009-04-29 is:
*S3M-4004 John Swinney: Budget Implications for Scotland—That the Parliament expresses its deep concern at the contents of the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Budget last week; recognises that this is a product of poor financial management of the UK economy in recent years that will leave unprecedented burdens of debt for many years to come; acknowledges the significant pressure that the reduction of planned budgets of £500 million will have on public services, and calls on the Scottish Government to bring forward budget proposals for 2010-11 that will support a sustainable economy and effective public services and include an assessment of the carbon impact of its budget. Supported by: Jim Mather*
You can search for this motion (S3M-4004) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S3M-4004, in the name of John Swinney, on budget implications for Scotland, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 42 | 0 | 91.3% |
| LDem | 0 | 1 | 15 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 46 | 0 | 0 | 97.9% |
| Total: | 64 | 43 | 15 | 95.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Jim Tolson | Dunfermline West | LDem | no |