[S3M-4065] Decision Time — 7 May 2009 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S3M-4065
The description in the bulletin on 2009-05-06 is:
*S3M-4065 Bill Aitken: Community Courts—That the Parliament notes with regret the decision of the Scottish Government not to proceed with the establishment of a community court in Glasgow; recognises that community courts based on the New York City model in Midtown can address patterns of offending behaviour by providing for swift and effective summary justice coupled with a range of rehabilitation services to break the cycle of reoffending, and believes that the recent action taken by the Scottish Government demonstrates its incoherent approach towards addressing crime and the causes of crime and to providing viable and robust alternatives to custody.
You can search for this motion (S3M-4065) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S3M-4065, in the name of Bill Aitken, on community courts, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 41 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 46 | 0 | 97.9% |
Total: | 73 | 46 | 0 | 93.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |