Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill — Funding Regional Development Agencies via Skills Funding — 4 Nov 2009 at 16:18
The Chief Executive may pay to a specified body such sums as appear to the Chief Executive appropriate for enabling the body but excluding a regional body such as a Regional Development Agency to meet costs and expenses incurred, or to be incurred, by it in formulating its strategy or keeping it under review.Immediately prior to the vote Baroness Sharp of Guildford explained why she was pressing for a vote saying: "I am also left with many doubts about whether the old fashioned, top-down labour market planning with our single integrated strategies, our NINJA boards and all the rest of it, is the right way to do it. I would therefore like to test the opinion of the House." The result of the vote not accepting the amendment was: Contents 96; Not-Contents 136.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Lab||112 (+2 tell)||0||53.0%|
|LDem||0||46 (+2 tell)||64.9%|
|Lord Pilkington of Oxenford||Con||no|
|Lord Best||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Crisp||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Low of Dalston||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Martin of Springburn||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Pannick||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Patel||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Sutherland of Houndwood||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Wedderburn of Charlton||Crossbench||no|