[S3M-5110.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 Nov 2009 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S3M-5110.2
The description in the bulletin on 2009-11-04 is:
*S3M-5110.2 John Scott: Scotland’s National Parks—As an amendment to motion (S3M-5110) in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, insert at end "while also welcoming the reduction in the size of the boards of the National Park Authorities, thereby producing greater efficiencies by way of reducing running costs, and emphasising that the proposed National Parks Strategy group must have a clear timescale of operation and well defined sense of purpose in its objectives."
You can search for this motion (S3M-5110.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-5110.2, in the name of John Scott, which also seeks to amend motion S3M-5110, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on Scotland's national parks, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Ayes | Noes | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| Green | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 35 | 0 | 76.1% |
| LDem | 0 | 14 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 36 | 0 | 0 | 76.6% |
| Total: | 51 | 51 | 0 | 80.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||