[S3M-5112.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Nov 2009 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S3M-5112.1
The description in the bulletin on 2009-11-05 is:
*S3M-5112.1 Adam Ingram: Supporting Families—As an amendment to motion (S3M-5112) in the name of Elizabeth Smith, leave out from "regrets" to end and insert "believes that the Scottish Government should focus on addressing the impact of the recession and take steps to ease the burden on families; recognises that long-term relationships provide stability in many families and acknowledges the status of marriage in society, and believes that the needs and best interests of the child should always be at the centre of policies to support and promote stable families and reflect the reality of family life in Scotland." Supported by: Fiona Hyslop*
You can search for this motion (S3M-5112.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-5112.1, in the name of Adam Ingram, as amended, which seeks to amend motion S3M-5112, in the name of Elizabeth Smith, on supporting families, be agreed to.
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 30 | 0 | 0 | 65.2% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 42 | 0 | 0 | 89.4% |
| Total: | 87 | 15 | 1 | 80.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||