Daylight Saving Bill — Conclude Second Reading debate — 3 Dec 2010 at 13:07
The Bill required consideration of advancing time by one hour for all, or part of, the year.
This vote came before the actual vote to pass the Second Reading (from where it would be reviewed by a public bill committee.
There is evidence of a filibuster over this Bill owing to problems of delay in the No lobby, and the fact that a division was made necessary by someone shouting "Object", and thus requiring at least 100 MPs being present on a Friday to vote in favour of ending the debate.
-  Daylight Savings Bill 2010-11, Legislative progress page
-  Deputy Speaker, House of Commons, 3 December 2010
-  Standing Order 36
-  Standing Order 37
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||74 (+1 tell)||5||0||26.1%|
|Lab||38 (+1 tell)||0||0||15.2%|
|LDem||9||2 (+1 tell)||0||21.1%|
|SNP||0||1 (+1 tell)||0||33.3%|
|David Nuttall||Bury North||Con (front bench)||no|
|Jacob Rees-Mogg||North East Somerset||Con (front bench)||no|
|Andrew Rosindell||Romford||Con (front bench)||no|
|Iain Stewart||Milton Keynes South||Con (front bench)||no|
|Malcolm Bruce||Gordon||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Edward Davey||Kingston and Surbiton||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Alan Reid||Argyll and Bute||LDem (front bench)||tellno|