Opposition Day — Local Government Funding — Spread Cuts Over Longer Period — Avoid Disproportionate Impact on Most Deprived Areas — 6 Dec 2010 at 21:44

The majority of MPs voted against spreading cuts to local government funding more evenly over four years and ensuring they do not fall disproportionately on the most deprived areas.

The motion rejected in this vote was:

  • That this House
  • notes with concern that local councils will lose, on average, 27 per cent. of their funding over the next four years, compared to 11 per cent., on average, for Whitehall departments;
  • regrets the frontloading of reductions in funding which means that the heaviest cuts will fall in the first year;
  • believes that the unexpected severity of the cuts will result in substantial job losses in the public and private sector, undermine the voluntary sector and hit frontline services;
  • regrets the inadequate level of capitalisation available to local councils to deal with redundancy costs of up to £2 billion;
  • further notes the commitment in the coalition agreement to ensure that fairness is at the heart of decisions and that those most in need are protected;
  • is disappointed that the most deprived areas will be hit hardest by the reductions in funding; and
  • calls on the Government to revise its proposals before making the provisional finance settlement to ensure that any reductions in funding are more evenly spread over four years and do not fall disproportionately on the most deprived communities.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con274 (+1 tell) 0089.9%
DUP0 1012.5%
Lab0 192 (+2 tell)075.5%
LDem42 (+1 tell) 1077.2%
PC0 2066.7%
Total:316 197081.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

David WardBradford EastLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive