NHS Reforms — Market Based Approach — 9 May 2011 at 18:28
The majority of MPs voted against fundamentally changing the Government's plans for NHS reforms including dropping the proposed market-based approach.
The text of the rejected motion read:
- That this House
- notes the growing concerns over the Government’s handling of the NHS and the effect its policies are having on hospitals and patient care; and
- calls on the Government to uphold the Coalition Agreement[1] promise to stop the top-down reorganisations of the NHS which have got in the way of patient care, to use the present pause in the progress of the Health and Social Care Bill[2] to make fundamental changes, including dropping the damaging and unjustified market-based approach, and to concentrate efforts instead on achieving sound efficiencies, better clinical quality and improved integration of services.
==
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 250 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 82.0% |
Lab | 0 | 227 (+2 tell) | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 33 (+1 tell) | 0 | 1 | 61.4% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 283 | 230 | 1 | 83.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Andrew George | St Ives | LDem (front bench) | both |