Public Service Pensions Bill — Clause 3 — Prevention of Reducing Accrued Pension Benefits — 4 Dec 2012 at 16:30

The majority of MPs voted not to expressly prevent new public sector pension schemes reducing accrued pensions benefits without the agreement of those affected.

MPs were considering the Public Service Pensions Bill.[1] The amendment rejected in this vote was:

  • amendment 10, page 2, line 16, at end insert—
  • ‘(3A) Scheme regulations shall not make any provision which would have the effect of reducing the amount of any pension, allowance or gratuity, insofar as that amount is directly or indirectly referable to rights which have accrued (whether by virtue of service rendered, contributions paid or any other thing done) before the coming into operation of the scheme, unless the persons specified in subsection (3B) have agreed to the inclusion of that provision.
  • (3B) The persons referred to in subsection (3A) are the persons or representatives of the persons who appear to the responsible authority to be likely to be affected by the regulations if they were made.’.

This would have added the above subclauses to clause 3 of the Bill[2].

At the time of the vote subclause 3(3)(c) permitted new pensions schemes to "make retrospective provision", the amendment seeks to ensure no one is made worse off as a result of a new scheme being introduced, unless they agree to the proposal.


Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con235 (+2 tell) 0077.7%
DUP0 3037.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 10100.0%
Lab0 208 (+2 tell)081.4%
LDem46 0080.7%
PC0 2066.7%
SDLP0 2066.7%
SNP0 5083.3%
Total:281 223079.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive