Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Timetable motion — 8 Oct 2013 at 17:44
The majority of MPs voted in favour of a proposed timetable for the consideration of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill.
It is not possible to ascribe a position on the substance of the Bill from an MP's vote in this division.
Both MPs who support and those who oppose the substance of the Bill might think it worthy of more time for debate and so oppose the proposed timetable.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Alliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Con | 265 (+2 tell) | 2 | 0 | 88.2% |
DUP | 0 | 7 | 0 | 87.5% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 0 | 227 (+2 tell) | 0 | 88.8% |
LDem | 52 | 0 | 0 | 92.9% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
SNP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 317 | 249 | 0 | 88.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Douglas Carswell | Clacton | Con | no |
Christopher Chope | Christchurch | Con (front bench) | no |