Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill — Licensing of those Working in the Financial Sector — 11 Dec 2013 at 14:53
Gavin Barwell MP, Croydon Central voted with the majority (Teller for the Ayes).
The majority of MPs voted against requiring those carrying out certain functions in the financial sector to be licensed.
The motion approved by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
- That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 41.
The rejected amendment 41 sought to insert a new clause titled Conduct of persons working in financial services sector which would have introduced a licensing regime aimed at raising standards of professionalism in the financial sector. The rejected scheme proposed would have required those "exercising controlled functions" to be approved and licensed.
-  Parliament's webpage on the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
-  Lords amendments to the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill
-  Page of Lords amendments to the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill containing amendment 41
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||252 (+1 tell)||0||0||83.0%|
|Lab||0||213 (+2 tell)||0||83.3%|
|LDem||42 (+1 tell)||0||0||76.8%|