Children and Families Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 7 Jan 2014 at 17:01

Clause 27: Duty to keep education and care provision under review

Amendment 25E

Moved by Baroness Howe of Idlicote

25E: Clause 27, page 23, line 3, at end insert-

“(2A) If the educational and social care provision referred to in subsection (1)(a) and (b) is deemed insufficient to meet the needs of children and young people under subsection (2), a local authority must-

(a) publish these findings;

(b) involve those consulted under subsection (3) in producing an action plan to revise the educational and social care provision referred to in subsection (1)(a) and (b);

(c) review and report on progress against the action plan; and

(d) revise the local offer accordingly.

(2B) Regulations shall make provision about-

(a) criteria to be used by local authorities in assessing whether the educational and social care provision referred to in subsection (1)(a) and (b) is sufficient under subsection (2);

(b) the information to be included in an authority’s action plan;

(c) how an authority is to involve children, young people and families in the production of, and assessment of progress against, its action plan;

(d) imposing time limits on implementing the revision of the educational and social care provision referred to in subsection (1)(a) and (b) that has been deemed insufficient under subsection (2A).”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop1 213.6%
Con160 (+1 tell) 070.3%
Crossbench14 36 (+1 tell)26.7%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge2 013.3%
Lab0 145 (+1 tell)64.9%
LDem73 (+1 tell) 071.8%
Non-affiliated1 03.1%
Other0 1100.0%
PC0 150.0%
UKIP0 133.3%
UUP2 0100.0%
Total:253 18753.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

The Bishop of Ripon and LeedsBishopno
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Lord Ballyedmond Crossbenchno
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Condon Crossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Kakkar Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rowe-Beddoe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Stirrup Crossbenchno
Lord Thomas of SwynnertonCrossbenchno
Lord Woolf Crossbenchno
Baroness Tonge LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive