Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 20 Jan 2014 at 15:54
Amendment 92
Moved by Lord Harris of Haringey)
92: Before Clause 111, insert the following new Clause-
“Crime and disorder reduction: development control
(1) The Secretary of State shall designate a body representative of chief officers of police for the purposes of this section.
(2) A body designated under this section shall publish guidelines that specify for a particular type of development the measures that should be included in that development to promote-
(a) crime and disorder reduction, and
(b) the prevention of anti-social behaviour.
(3) Guidelines under this section shall only be produced following consultation with organisations that represent-
(a) local authorities, and
(b) persons engaged in the design and construction of developments requiring planning permission.
(4) A planning authority may, in respect of any application that it receives for planning permission, specify as a condition for the approval of that planning permission that the development concerned must follow guidelines published under this section.
(5) A planning authority may only specify a condition under subsection (4) if it is satisfied that to do so would promote-
(a) crime and disorder reduction, or
(b) the prevention of anti-social behaviour.”
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 2 | 0 | 9.1% |
Con | 135 (+1 tell) | 0 | 59.4% |
Crossbench | 22 | 27 | 25.7% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 1 | 13.3% |
Lab | 0 | 137 (+2 tell) | 61.5% |
LDem | 65 (+1 tell) | 0 | 64.1% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
UKIP | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 226 | 169 | 50.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Aberdare | Crossbench | no |
Lord Bilimoria | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Butler-Sloss | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Clancarty | Crossbench | no |
Lord Crisp | Crossbench | no |
Lord Fellowes | Crossbench | no |
Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
Lord Hannay of Chiswick | Crossbench | no |
Lord Harries of Pentregarth | Crossbench | no |
Lord Jones of Birmingham | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard | Crossbench | no |
Lord Laming | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Lytton | Crossbench | no |
Baroness O'Loan | Crossbench | no |
Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve | Crossbench | no |
Lord Pannick | Crossbench | no |
Lord Patel | Crossbench | no |
Lord Rowe-Beddoe | Crossbench | no |
Lord Scott of Foscote | Crossbench | no |
Lord Stirrup | Crossbench | no |
Lord Thomas of Swynnerton | Crossbench | no |
Lord Wright of Richmond | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Falkland | LDem | aye |