Childcare Payments Bill — New Clause 2 — Review of Impact of State Help With Childcare Costs for Those in Work — 17 Nov 2014 at 19:15

The majority of MPs voted against requiring a regular report on the impact of state help with childcare costs for those in work.

MPs were considering the Childcare Payments Bill[1]. The proposed new clause, rejected in this vote was titled: Review of impact on childcare costs and stated:

  • (1) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall, three months after this Act is passed, and every three years thereafter, review the impact of the measures in this Act on the cost of childcare with particular reference to—
  • (a) the effectiveness of this Act on making childcare more affordable;
  • (b) the average cost of childcare for parents in work, including the impact of other changes to the tax and benefits system and with reference to the trends in childcare costs since 2010; and
  • (c) the impact of supply-led measures on the cost of childcare.

The Bill[1] provided for payments of 25% of childcare costs, capped at £2,000 per child each year, for those responsible for children and in work. The explanatory notes to the Bill[2] state an intent to make the payments in relation children under 12 (under 17 for disabled children) as well as an intent to make the payments available to those earning up to £150,000 per year. These payments were announced in the 2013 Budget when they were described as "tax-free childcare"[2] (in the Bill they are described as top-up "payments"). The scheme has been publicised and has a start date of Autumn 2015[3].

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con231 (+1 tell) 0076.6%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 197 (+2 tell)077.1%
LDem39 (+1 tell) 0071.4%
PC0 2066.7%
Respect0 10100.0%
SDLP0 2066.7%
SNP0 5083.3%
Total:271 208076.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive