Immigation Bill — Third Reading — 1 Dec 2015 at 18:58

The majority of MPs voted to create criminal offences of renting a home, driving, and working, while disqualified from doing so due to immigration status; and for other measures in the Immigration Bill.

The majority of MPs voted in favour of the Immigration Bill[1].

The Bill:

  • Makes it an offence to let private residential premises to adults disqualified from renting as a result of their immigration status.
  • Introduces new powers for landlords to evict illegal migrants from private rented accommodation.
  • Creates a new offence of driving a vehicle on a road or other public place when the driver of the vehicle is not lawfully in the UK
  • Makes it a criminal offence for a person subject to immigration control to work if they have not been granted leave to enter or remain, have overstayed that leave, or are in breach of a condition on that leave that prohibits work.
  • Requires banks to check the immigration status of current account holders and to, in the majority of cases, facilitate the closure of accounts held by illegal migrants.
  • Amends the offence of employing an illegal worker, set out in Section 21 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 to make the offence easier to prove. The change makes it an offence to employ someone ineligible to work on immigration grounds if an employer has a ‘reasonable cause to believe’ the employee is ineligible rather than ‘knowing' they have an immigration status which makes them ineligible.
  • Establishes a Director of Labour Market Enforcement responsible for preparing the strategy for enforcing laws on gang-masters, the national minimum wage and on who can run employment agencies.
  • Makes it a requirement for a license to sell alcohol that the licensee has the right to work in the UK.
  • Gives powers to Police Constables, Immigration Officers, and others, to search for a driving licence within premises occupied by someone believed to be not lawfully resident for a driving licence.

The motion supported by the majority of MPs taking part in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Third time.

The result of the vote meant the Bill could continue its path to becoming law.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con297 (+2 tell) 0090.6%
DUP7 0087.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 20100.0%
Lab0 181 (+2 tell)079.2%
LDem0 3037.5%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 30100.0%
SNP0 52096.3%
UUP2 00100.0%
Total:307 245086.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive