Opposition Day — Transitional State Pension Arrangements for Women — 24 Feb 2016 at 16:41
The majority of MPs voted against transitional arrangements for women adversely affected by the acceleration of the increase in the state pension age.
The motion rejected by the majority of MPs taking part in this vote was:
- That this House
- notes that the e-petition 110776, Make fair transitional state pension arrangements for 1950s women, has attracted more than 150,000 signatures; and
- calls on the Government to bring forward proposals for transitional arrangements for women adversely affected by the acceleration of the increase in the state pension age.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||289 (+2 tell)||6||0||90.0%|
|Lab||0||194 (+2 tell)||0||84.8%|
|Peter Bottomley||Worthing West||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Nadine Dorries||Mid Bedfordshire||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Gordon Henderson||Sittingbourne and Sheppey||Con||aye|
|Philip Hollobone||Kettering||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Tim Loughton||East Worthing and Shoreham||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Jason McCartney||Colne Valley||Con (front bench)||aye|