Finance Bill — New Clause 1 Review of Income Tax Treatment of Workers Providing Services Through Intermediaries — 27 Jun 2016 at 19:15
The majority of MPs voted against a review on the impact of the income tax treatment of workers defined as provided services through intermediaries.
MPs were considering the Finance Bill.[1]
The proposed new clause rejected in this vote stated:
- The Chancellor of the Exchequer must conduct a strategic review of the impact on workers defined as providing services through intermediaries of their treatment for income tax purposes, including the differential impact on different types of worker, and must publish the report of the review within six months of the passing of this Act.
==
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 309 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 94.2% |
| DUP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 187 | 0 | 81.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 6 | 0 | 75.0% |
| PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SNP | 0 | 46 (+2 tell) | 0 | 88.9% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 316 | 247 | 0 | 88.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||